My ultimate favorite American interpretive historian, Richard Hofstadter, expressed both consensus and revisionist views. I have always recommended to my students that they read the works of both.

Throughout the past century of American historiography, there has always been a conflict between the works of “consensus” and “revisionist” historians.

“Interpretive history,” as distinguished from mere narrative or descriptive history, involves the ability of the historian to apply his critical thinking to ascertain the motives and beliefs of the historical figures in question. in history or some related field, such as philosophy, religion, or political science. One usually acquires the capacity for critical thinking either by the attainment of a PhD. I was fortunate to have attended Northwestern University, which at that time and continuing to the present has had one of the top history departments in the nation.Īs a product of the tutelage of my Northwestern professors, my focus has always been on the books of distinguished interpretive historians, who have demonstrated their capacity for critical thinking. My study of history over the last half century has been focused primarily on American history, with Middle East history and European history running close behind. Given my penchant for citing works of American history, I am often asked for my criteria in book selection. Before I proceed with my discussion of Begin Again, I ask your indulgence for a personal note.Īs my readership has grown, so has the number of my readers who are college students.

Books by eddie glaude jr